The universe shouldn’t exist, according to new ultra-precise measurements of anti-protons.
But the fact that I’m typing this article and you’re reading it, however, suggests that we are here, so something must be awry with our understanding of the physics the universe is governed by.
The universe is the embodiment of an epic battle between matter and antimatter that occurred immediately after the Big Bang, 13.82 billion years ago. Evidently, matter won — because there are galaxies, stars, planets, you, me, hamsters, long walks on sandy beaches and beer — but how matter won is one of the biggest mysteries hanging over physics.
It is predicted that equal amounts of matter and antimatter were produced in the primordial universe (a basic prediction by the Standard Model of physics), but if that’s the case, all matter in the universe should have been annihilated when it came into contact with its antimatter counterpart — a Big Bang followed by a big disappointment.
This physics conundrum focuses on the idea that all particles have their antimatter twin with the same quantum numbers, only the exact opposite. Protons have anti-protons, electrons have positrons, neutrinos have anti-neutrinos etc.; a beautiful example of symmetry in the quantum world. But should one of these quantum numbers be very slightly different between matter and antimatter particles, it might explain why matter became the dominant “stuff” of the universe.
So, in an attempt to measure one of the quantum states of particles, physicists of CERN’s Baryon–Antibaryon Symmetry Experiment (BASE), located near Geneva, Switzerland, have made the most precise measurement of the anti-proton’s magnetic moment. BASE is a complex piece of hardware that can precisely measure the magnetic moments of protons and anti-protons in an attempt to detect an extremely small difference between the two. Should there be a difference, this might explain why matter is more dominant than antimatter.
However, this latest measurement of the magnetic moment of anti-protons has revealed that the magnetic moments of both protons and anti-protons are exactly the same to a record-breaking level of precision. In fact, the anti-proton measurement is even more precise than our measurements of the magnetic moment of a proton — a stunning feat considering how difficult anti-protons are to study.
“It is probably the first time that physicists get a more precise measurement for antimatter than for matter, which demonstrates the extraordinary progress accomplished at CERN’s Antiproton Decelerator,” said physicist Christian Smorra in a CERN statement. The Antiproton Decelerator is a machine that can capture antiparticles (created from particle collisions that occur at CERN’s Proton Synchrotron) and funnel them to other experiments, like BASE.
Antimatter is very tricky to observe and measure. Should these antiparticles come into contact with particles, they annihilate — you can’t simply shove a bunch of anti-protons into a flask and expect them to play nice. So, to prevent antimatter from making contact with matter, physicists have to create magnetic vacuum “traps” that can quarantine anti-protons from touching matter, thereby allowing further study.
A major area of research has been to develop ever more sophisticated magnetic traps; the slightest imperfections in a trap’s magnetic field containing the antimatter can allow particles to leak. The more perfect the magnetic field, the less chance there is of leakage and the longer antimatter remains levitating away from matter. Over the years, physicists have achieved longer and longer antimatter containment records.
In this new study, published in the journal Nature on Oct. 18, researchers used a combination of two cryogenically-cooled Penning traps that held anti-protons in place for a record-breaking 405 days. In that time they were able to apply another magnetic field to the antimatter, forcing quantum jumps in the particles’ spin. By doing this, they could measure their magnetic moments to astonishing accuracy.
According to their study, anti-protons have a magnetic moment of −2.792847344142 μN (where μN is the nuclear magneton, a physical constant). The proton’s magnetic moment is 2.7928473509 μN, almost exactly the same — the slight difference is well within the experiment’s error margin. As a consequence, if there’s a difference between the magnetic moment of protons and anti-protons, it must be much smaller than the experiment can currently detect.
These tiny measurements have huge — you could say: universal — implications.
“All of our observations find a complete symmetry between matter and antimatter, which is why the universe should not actually exist,” added Smorra. “An asymmetry must exist here somewhere but we simply do not understand where the difference is.”
Now the plan is to improve methods of capturing antimatter particles, pushing BASE to even higher precision, to see if there really is an asymmetry in magnetic moment between protons and anti-protons. If there’s not, well, physicists will need to find their asymmetry elsewhere.
10 thoughts on “Antimatter Angst: The Universe Shouldn’t Exist”
After reading this article:https://www.sciencealert.com/physicists-have-captured-the-first-spectral-fingerprints-of-antimatter
Explain to me how anyone can know whether a star or galaxy in the universe is made of Matter vs. Anti-Matter.
Answer: You cannot. Therefore to claim that all anti-matter in the universe is gone is false. No one could prove that all the anti-matter in this galaxy is gone. I fail to understand why I get this, but the really educated people seem to miss the point. If you cannot tell matter from antimatter by their spectral emissions, then you cannot prove that any material any where is one or the other.
Sorry for the rant, the first lines of your article just annoyed me.
There is no evidence to suggest that is the case. This is a really good explanation: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-do-we-know-that-dista/
I totally agree.
Also, we should not assume that the birth of the universe only produced one universe. Its possible that another universe was created predominantly with antimatter being left behind.
FYI….I have just completed my final paper clarifying everything I’ve been developing over the last few years and I am assuming that because of the need to introduce a new conceptual picture of the Triangle of Time and of Time itself vis a vis Gravitational energy density I realised that I had to put Anti-Gravity somewhere.
If Time and Gravity have an inverse relationship and do so in a a positive reality then if Time is an energy force it must be tied to gravitational energy especially in the Present but as importantly so must the Future.
If we cannot place the Past in a positive reality then it must be tied to a negative reality which is where I have positioned Anti-Gravity. Given that every moment we experience in the Present must flow from the Future, based on recently experienced moments of our Present that have slipped into the Past, it means that the Future is predicated on information from that Past.
In order to ensure that the Triangle of Time flow is always in this predictable direction then if Time is an energy force it must be re-energised by Anti-Gravity from the Past into a positive reality which is to say, is the Future.
This accounts for why we are here and it applies to why entanglement allows for particles in superposition and based on this I have developed a new conceptual picture of the triangle of Reality to unify Gravity and as a consequence developed a proposal for the Fundamental Law.
Only thing I can think of to explain this is that the particles spontaneously re-appear after destruction.
The reason why antimatter has disappeared is that it still extant in the Universe but was mechanically separated from matter by a spinning Universe in the immediate aftermath of the Big Bang. With inflation, the Universe’s spin parameters subsequently became almost negligible, and almost undetectable. The Universal spin parameters also caused galaxy formation and their spinning and resulted in non singularity Black Hole formation in the centre of galaxies. The precise mechanism on how this happened is summarised in Appendix G of the book ‘The Universe Is A Machine’ (see Troubador website), and is explained in still much clearer terms in the pending eBook ‘Everything Equals Nothing: The Universe for young scientists, mathematicians and philosophers’.
The reason why antimatter has disappeared is that it still extant in the Universe but was mechanically separated from matter by a spinning Universe in the immediate aftermath of the Big Bang. With inflation, the Universe’s spin parameters subsequently became almost negligible, and almost undetectable. The Universal spin parameters also caused galaxy formation and their spinning and resulted in non singularity Black Hole formation in the centre of galaxies. The precise mechanism on how this happened is summarised in Appendix H of the book ‘The Universe Is A Machine’ (see Troubador website), and is explained in still much clearer terms in the pending eBook ‘Everything Equals Nothing: The Universe for young scientists, mathematicians and philosophers’.
Let me ask fundamental Q: assume antimatter is very much identical with matter except sign of charge; is in your opinion antimatter-antimatter interaction is identical to matter-matter interaction?
When there is no retreat, the potential will be exerted.